Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugs in isotonic regression ? #219

Open
BatyLeo opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Bugs in isotonic regression ? #219

BatyLeo opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@BatyLeo
Copy link

BatyLeo commented Aug 21, 2023

Hello !

By testing the isotonic method from this package and comparing it with a custom implementation, I faced some strange behaviours.

First, the output seems to always be ordered, regardless of the first input arg x:

julia> isotonic(5:-1:1, 5:-1:1)
5-element Vector{Float64}:
 1.0
 2.0
 3.0
 4.0
 5.0

Shouldn't it return [5.0, 4.0, 3.0, 2.0, 1.0] instead ?

Second, even when using an ordered x, it seems that the output solution is often suboptimal:

julia> y = [0.52, 0.58, -1.91, -1.12, -1.04]

julia> sol = isotonic(1:length(y), y)
5-element Vector{Float64}:
 -0.8725
 -0.8725
 -0.8725
 -0.8725
 -0.8725

In this example, the output x is a worse solution than the mean of y

julia> sol_mean = fill(sum(y) / length(y), length(y))
5-element Vector{Float64}:
 -0.594
 -0.594
 -0.594
 -0.594
 -0.594

julia> sum((vi - yi) ^ 2 for (vi, yi) in zip(sol, y))
5.21453125

julia> sum((vi - yi) ^ 2 for (vi, yi) in zip(sol_mean, y))
4.826719999999999
@EvoArt
Copy link

EvoArt commented Feb 26, 2024

I also seem to be getting incorrect outputs when fitting a MetricMDS with metric = isotonic

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants