-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat Implementation for issue#1017 #1027
Conversation
…r components. other components prop types will live here
@utin-francis-peter is attempting to deploy a commit to the Arc53 Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
hi @utin-francis-peter
|
Thanks for the review, @siiddhantt. Based on the current design, Considering these, what options do you propose for the variant prop? Also, would you advise a camelCase or ALLCAPS style be used for the options so they act as an enum? |
Co-authored-by: Siddhant Rai <[email protected]>
…into feat/issue#1017
@utin-francis-peter would something like |
It does sound cool. Perhaps the prop could be |
…er/DocsGPT into feat/issue#1017
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1027 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 21.83% 21.83%
=======================================
Files 80 80
Lines 3645 3645
=======================================
Hits 796 796
Misses 2849 2849 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
One note before merging, is lets not create a component for input box from conversation.tsx for a few reasons:
So in a scope of this PR, lets not touch conversation.tsx Thank you! |
Hi, Alex. During the first iteration I created a In the next iteration I created separate custom Do I move out |
Yes, lets move it for now as we have few PR's open that will change it. |
Please a quick one, Alex: Do I leave the So it's there but not used in the specified file until all PRs using the current |
Just don't use textArea yet, you can remove it in this pr for now Thank you! |
…side scope of branch/issue
…into feat/issue#1017
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
I missed it myself, seems like we have 1 warning |
Arrgggghh. So sorry, Alex. |
No worries at all! |
div contentEditable
to a more accessibleTextArea
custom componentInput
component with default tw classes to make the inputs across frontend DRYWhy was this change needed? (You can also link to an open issue here)
As highlighted in issue#1017: "Reduce redundancy, ensure consistency, improve maintainability, enhance code quality, and clean up the codebase."
Other information:
closes: 🚀 Feature: Create reusable input field component and cleanup code #1017