Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

use README instead of repo description #18

Open
lrusnac opened this issue Oct 2, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

use README instead of repo description #18

lrusnac opened this issue Oct 2, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@csurfer

Comments

@lrusnac
Copy link

lrusnac commented Oct 2, 2017

Just an idea:
I think README would be the best thing to run LDA on, since it contains a pretty good description of the project. Projects without README should be penalised either way. Often times the repository description is too short to describe in detail what the repository is all about.
@lrusnac lrusnac changed the title use README instead of project description use README instead of repo description Oct 2, 2017
@csurfer csurfer self-assigned this Oct 9, 2017
@csurfer
Copy link
Owner

csurfer commented Oct 9, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Too slow for the web service. So won't include it in http://www.gitsuggest.com. But will make it part of API package.

@lrusnac
Copy link
Author

lrusnac commented Oct 13, 2017

@csurfer what about having some cache, train once a day or something?
It's funny, github has a discover feature now too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@csurfer csurfer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lrusnac @csurfer