Skip to content

Issues: edamontology/edam-sandbox

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

37 Open 6 Closed
37 Open 6 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Replace everywhere 'master' with 'main'
#43 opened Mar 27, 2021 by matuskalas
2
Existing edamxpathvalidator test : consider & replacedBy targets are OK
#40 opened May 6, 2020 by joncison
Existing edamxpathvalidator test: consider & replaceBy targets not obsolete
#39 opened May 6, 2020 by joncison
Existing edamxpathvalidator test : replaced_by target not obsolete
#38 opened May 6, 2020 by joncison
Existing edamxpathvalidator test : unique synonyms within a namespace
#37 opened May 6, 2020 by joncison
Existing edamxpathvalidator test : superclass is not deprecated
#36 opened May 6, 2020 by joncison
Existing edamxpathvalidator test : no self-references
#35 opened May 6, 2020 by joncison
Existing edamxpathvalidator test : relationship targets are not deprecated
#34 opened May 6, 2020 by joncison
Existing edamxpathvalidator test : definition cardinality check
#33 opened May 6, 2020 by joncison
Existing edamxpathvalidator test : label ending with "." character
#32 opened May 6, 2020 by joncison
Existing edamxpathvalidator test : is there at least one lable
#31 opened May 6, 2020 by joncison
Existing edamxpathvalidator test : multiple rdfs:labels
#30 opened May 6, 2020 by joncison
Existing edamxpathvalidator test: numerical ID checks against next_id
#29 opened May 6, 2020 by joncison
Identifier concepts should have both Data & Identifiers subset assignations done - pending review Issue / check is implemented, but a review of it is needed.
#28 opened Apr 23, 2020 by joncison
@joncison
1
Multiple erroneous subset assignations done - pending review Issue / check is implemented, but a review of it is needed.
#27 opened Apr 23, 2020 by joncison
@joncison
1
Mandatory relations on Format concept missing
#26 opened Apr 22, 2020 by joncison
@joncison
Check for bad subsets on deprecated concepts done - pending review Issue / check is implemented, but a review of it is needed.
#25 opened Apr 20, 2020 by joncison
@joncison
Wikipedia link missing from Topic concepts done - pending review Issue / check is implemented, but a review of it is needed.
#24 opened Apr 7, 2020 by joncison
@joncison
1
Misuse of wikipedia links done - pending review Issue / check is implemented, but a review of it is needed.
#23 opened Apr 7, 2020 by joncison
@joncison
1
Input needed on edamverify architecture help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
#22 opened Mar 19, 2020 by joncison
@hmenager @joncison @albangaignard
Format driven validation of data concepts
#21 opened Mar 15, 2020 by joncison
EDAM format concept file extension includes a period ('.') character done - pending review Issue / check is implemented, but a review of it is needed.
#20 opened Mar 15, 2020 by joncison
1
Issue with format file extensions done - pending review Issue / check is implemented, but a review of it is needed.
#19 opened Mar 15, 2020 by joncison
@joncison
5
Check that numerical component of an EDAM concept ID is unique done - pending review Issue / check is implemented, but a review of it is needed.
#18 opened Mar 3, 2020 by joncison
@joncison
1
Check concept ID namespace matches specified subset done - pending review Issue / check is implemented, but a review of it is needed.
#17 opened Mar 3, 2020 by joncison
@joncison
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.